Seni Cinta; Menggugat Maskulinitas Cinta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24014/sb.v15i1.5733Keywords:
Cinta, Sosiologi Cinta, MaskulinitasAbstract
This article using perspective of sociology of love in described love and see how love are very resilient with the Indonesia culture of patriarchy, included the description of masculinity love. Love used as an anomaly that is absolutely. Even absolute backfire for mankind cult of love. Sociology of love is not lay away to love as selfish person, on the other hand the power of love which dispatch people to peace. The illustrations and examples in this paper is based on knowledge and personal experience of mine. This paper write done by digging of various sources reference, which is I speculate by inference Freud said that love in now is still in animality essence. The masculine love is still adhered to this esence, and still alives in Nusantara’s culture.References
Amstrong, K. (2014). Love: Perspective from Sociology, Philosophy and Religious Studies. http://what-when-how.com/love-in-world-religions/love-perspectives-from-sociology-philosophy-and-peligious-studies/ Diunduh tanggal 6 Februari 2018, pukul 16.12 WIB.
Charter, J. (2015). The Sociology of Love. https://www.thesociologicalreview.com/blog/the-sociology-of-love.html Diakses tanggal 8 Februari 2018, pukul 9.25 WIB.
Fowler, A., C. Love and Marriage: Through the Lens of Sociological Theories. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge. Vol. 5, Issue 2, (2007), P. 61-72.
Freud, S. (2009). Pengantar Umum Psikoanalisis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Freud, S. (2017). Cinta yang Tak Semestinya: Deviant Love. Surabaya: Ecosystem Publishing.
Giddens, A. (2006). Sociology (Fifth Edition). Cambridge: Polity Publishing.
Krich, A., M., (Ed). (2009). Anatomi Cinta: Risalah Jalan Cinta, Arti Cinta & Kekuatan Cinta. Jakarta: Komunitas Bambu.
Marcuse, H. (2004). Cinta dan Peradaban. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Niko, N. (2016a). Cinta Tak Seharusnya Pergi. https://www.qureta.com/post/cinta-tak-seharusnya-pergi Diunduh tanggal 12 Februari 2018, pukul 23.11 WIB.
Niko, N. (2016b). Realitas Cinta Sejenis: Perspektif Sociology of Love. www.suarakita.org/2016/03/opini-realitas-cinta-sejenis-perspektif-sociology-of-love/ Diunduh pada tanggal 8 Maret 2018, pukul 21.20 WIB.
Niko, N. (2016c). Boy Prostitute: Kemiskinan dan Life Style. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Popova, M. (2016). Why Love Hurts: The Sociology of How Our Institutions Rather Than Our Personal Psychological Failings Shape the Romantic Agony of Modern Life. https://www.brainpickings.org/2016/03/22/why-love-hurts-eva-illouz/ Diunduh tanggal 6 Maret 2018, pukul 10.11 WIB.
Shiva, V. (1997). Bebas Dari Pembangunan: Perempuan, Ekologi dan Perjuangan Hidup di India. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Sorokin, P. (1950). Altruistic Love. Boston: Beacon Press.
Wijaya, A., & Ananta, W. P. (2016). Darurat Kejahatan Seksual. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
