Aspek Kearifan Lokal dalam Pelestarian Lingkungan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24014/af.v16i2.4376Keywords:
kearifan lokal, tanah adat, antroposentrik, eco-cultureAbstract
One of the ironiesof thedevelopment of human civilizationisthe developmentandmodernizationis intended toimprove the quality ofhuman life, butitis moreoftenthe presence ofpeoplebecome victims of development and modernization. More ironically, landandindigenous peoplesare victimsofan anthropocentricperspectiveand government policiesthat do notfavor thelocal community.This is attributable to several factors: First, the ideology of developmentalism does not incorporate local wisdom, especially regarding indigenous land policy and management and wealth preservation socio-economic-cultural as an integral part of all development programs. In the ideology of developmentalism traditionalism is the opposite of modernization so that all that is traditional, including indigenous lands rich culture and local wisdom considered adaptive in the times. Second, misperceptions people who think the indigenous people of Rokan Hilir as a destroyer of the environment that must be removed or relocated in order to save the environment. Yet, precisely Rokan Hilir indigenous peoples are the guardians of the environment from the invasion and destruction by outside communities, immigrant communities. Third, the nature only in terms of economic value, so that the release of the entire ecological value, the local political, social, cultural, spiritual and moral associated with customary land and the lives of indigenous peoples in the surrounding. Exploit indigenous lands and natural resources for the purpose of economic development and seen off as not have negative consequences for the existence of the indigenous population. Fourth, modernization and progress of civilization seen and measured primarily by the quality of the physical-economic-capitalistic. To improve thesocio-economiclevelof local communities, especiallythe Malaysmust bereturnedto theethical valuesof indigenous peoples. Socio-economicrights ofindigenous peoples should berecognized and guaranteedby the government. There must bepolitical commitmentatglobal and national levelstoprotectthe land rights ofindigenouspeoples andall the wisdomof socioeconomicThroughparadigm approacheco-culture istosave the existence ofindigenous landas a factorsupportingeconomic activityand allthe wealthandwisdom oftraditional, it can also besave theecological crisisis mainlycaused by faultyworldviewthatpolicy makersanthropocentric-capitalistic paradigmshould be changedtoeco-culture perspective.
References
Haar, T B,. 1931 Het Adatrecht van Naderlandsch –Indie in Watenschap, Practij en Onderwijs
Keraf, A.S. 2010 Etika Lingkungan. Jakarta, Kompas
Vollenhoven, C 1930 Het Adatrecht van Naderlandsch- Indi, Dell III dalam Soerjono Soekonto, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Adat ., Bandung 1984.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.