Communication Techniques for Persuasion of Students and Lecturers In Shaping Behavior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24014/sitekin.v20i2.22710Abstract
Many factors influence a student's success in the academic world. One of them is the role of the lecturer in providing direction or guidance on the problems experienced by students while on campus. Lecturers who act like this are called academic advisors. Lecturers in the formation of student behavior are strongly influenced by the ability of lecturers to communicate. Persuasive communication is an effective communication technique in shaping behavior because by using this communication, students can do something they want without feeling burdened and afraid. Forming behavior is an activity of communication and social interaction between lecturers and students to convey their knowledge in small and large groups. In learning activities, there are teaching techniques so that learning objectives can be achieved. Persuasive communication, in this case, is effective enough to influence or shape behavior.
References
C. Oschatz, “Long-term persuasive effects in narrative communication research: A meta-analysis,” J. Commun., vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 473–495, 2020, doi: 10.1093/joc/jqaa017.
I. Goovaerts, “Uncivil Communication and Simplistic Argumentation: Decreasing Political Trust, Increasing Persuasive Power?,” Polit. Commun., vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 768–788, 2020, doi: 10.1080/10584609.2020.1753868.
M. L. Tseng, “Sustainable packaged food and beverage consumption transition in Indonesia: Persuasive communication to affect consumer behavior,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 161, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104933.
Q. A. Nguyen, “Explaining Intentions by Vietnamese Schoolchildren to Adopt Pro-Environmental Behaviors in Response to Climate Change Using Theories of Persuasive Communication,” Environ. Manage., vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 845–857, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01334-0.
P. Antonetti, “When Blame-Giving Crisis Communications are Persuasive: A Dual-Influence Model and Its Boundary Conditions,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 59–78, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04370-x.
M. Becker, “It’s not just about the product: How persuasive communication affects the disclosure of personal health information,” Data Base Adv. Inf. Syst., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 37–50, 2020, doi: 10.1145/3380799.3380804.
E. Novianti, “Persuasive Communication: Disaster Literacy in Tourism Areas,” Rev. Int. Geogr. Educ. Online, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1203–1210, 2021, doi: 10.33403/rigeo.8006836.
F. Ferretti, “Persuasive conversation as a new form of communication in Homo sapiens,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 376, no. 1824. 2021. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0196.
A. Cancela, “Hedonic vs. epistemic goals in processing persuasive communications: Revisiting the role of personal involvement,” Motiv. Emot., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 280–298, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11031-021-09873-7.
M. Page, “Teaching medical professionalism: A qualitative exploration of persuasive communication as an educational strategy,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1993-0.
N. Yusof, “Group identity and extremism: The reflective experiences of youths regarding persuasive communication,” Child. Youth Serv. Rev., vol. 120, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105743.
Y. G. Seo, “Lifestyle counselling by persuasive information and communications technology reduces prevalence of metabolic syndrome in a dose–response manner: a randomized clinical trial (PrevMetSyn),” Ann. Med., vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 321–330, 2020, doi: 10.1080/07853890.2020.1783455.
A. J. Lazard, “Impact of photo manipulation and visual literacy on consumers’ responses to persuasive communication,” J. Vis. Lit., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 90–110, 2020, doi: 10.1080/1051144X.2020.1737907.
M. K. Cha, “When people low in social class become a persuasive source of communication: Social class of other donors and charitable donations,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 112, pp. 45–55, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.039.
N. Green, “Measuring Users’ Attitudinal and Behavioral Responses to Persuasive Communication Techniques in Human Robot Interaction,” ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, vol. 2022. pp. 778–782, 2022. doi: 10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889306.
Y. T. Negash, “Household waste separation intentions in mongolia: Persuasive communication leads to perceived convenience and behavioral control,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 20, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132011346.
A. Ort, “Mental contrasting with implementation intentions as a technique for media-mediated persuasive health communication,” Health Psychol. Rev., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 602–621, 2022, doi: 10.1080/17437199.2021.1988866.
E. M. A. Geurts, “Persuasive communication in medical decision-making during consultations with patients with limited health literacy in hospital-based palliative care,” Patient Educ. Couns., vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 1130–1137, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.022.
K. Stepaniuk, “Persuasive linguistic tricks in social media marketing communication-The memetic approach,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 7, 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253983.
M. J. C. Quintero, “Persuasive communication in politics as a fundamental element in the success of new political parties in Spain: Issuer, message and context. The case of Podemos and Ciudadanos,” Estud. Sobre el Mensaje Periodis., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 59–69, 2020, doi: 10.5209/esmp.67286.
S. Rubinelli, “It is time for health institutions to invest in persuasive communication to combat low quality information: A lesson learned from the COVID-19 infodemic,” Front. Commun., vol. 7, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2022.1006302.
I. Giammusso, “The matching effect in persuasive communication about lockdown,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.987114.
Z. Ahmed, “Persuasive Communications, Online Reviews and Service Performances-A Study on the Hotel Industry of New Zealand,” Australas. Accounting, Bus. Financ. J., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 4–20, 2022, doi: 10.14453/aabfj.v16i1.2.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Copyright Notice
An author who publishes in the SITEKIN Journal agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.
