A Proposed Business Models of Product-Service Systems for Lighting System

Authors

  • Rangga Primadasa Departement of Industrial Engineering Universitas Muria Kudus, Kudus, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0403-6409
  • Sugeng Slamet Departement of Mechanical Engineering Universitas Muria Kudus, Kudus, Indonesia
  • Salman Alfarisi Departement of Industrial Engineering Universitas Muria Kudus, Kudus, Indonesia
  • Imam Abdul Rozaq Departement of Electrical Engineering Universitas Muria Kudus, Kudus, Indonesia
  • Akhmad Zidni Hudaya Departement of Mechanical Engineering Universitas Muria Kudus, Kudus, Indonesia
  • Yusuke Tsutsui Deparment of Systems Engineering Faculty of Computer Science and Systems Engineering, Okayama Prefectural University, Japan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24014/sitekin.v21i2.30043

Abstract

The growing nature of the business world necessitates continual innovation in business models. In response to the growing need for sustainable and flexible business practices, Product-Service Systems (PSS) have gained traction across various industries. However, the LED manufacturing industry remains predominantly product-centric. In order to fill this gap, this study aims to investigate the feasibility of transitioning the LED lighting business model to a Product-Services Systems (PSS) approach. This study investigates several alternate PSS Lighting System business models using morphological analysis. The Business Model Canvas v2.2 framework is then used to assess these options' acceptability, viability, and feasibility. Selected PSS lighting systems are then detailed within the Business Model Canvas. Four business models for the PSS Lighting System are identified in the study as potentially viable for implementation: the product leasing, sharing, pooling, and activity management lighting systems. Additionally, this study advances our theoretical knowledge of PSS, especially as it relates to the PSS Lighting System business model. Furthermore, this study offers insights into expanding existing business models by integrating multiple lighting system models proposed in this study

References

T. S. Baines et al., “State-of-the-art in product service-systems,” J. Eng. Manuf., vol. 221, pp. 1–11, 2007, doi: 10.1243/09544054JEM858.

C. Vezzoli, F. Ceschin, J. C. Diehl, and C. Kohtala, “New Design Challenges to Widely Implement ‘ Sustainable Product-Service Systems ’”.

F. Tonelli, P. Taticchi, and E. S. Sue, “A Framework for Assessment and Implementation of Product-Service Systems Strategies : Learning From an Action Research in the Health-Care Sector .,” WSEAS Trans. Bus. Econ., vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 303–319, 2009.

A. Annarelli, C. Battistella, and F. Nonino, “Product service system : A conceptual framework from a systematic review,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 139, pp. 1011–1032, 2016.

O. Mont, “Clarifying the concept of Product-Service System,” J. Clean. Prod., 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00039-7.

T. A. Tran and J. Y. Park, “Development of integrated design methodology for various types of product – service systems,” J. Comput. Des. Eng., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 37–47, 2014, doi: 10.7315/JCDE.2014.004.

D. Demyanova, M. Colucci, E. Sirimal, and A. Vecchi, “Assessing consumers ’ propensity towards product-service systems in the fashion industry : A cross-national comparison between Russia and Italy,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 428, no. February, p. 139302, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139302.

A. Tukker, “EIGHT TYPES OF PRODUCT – SERVICE SYSTEM : EIGHT WAYS TO SUSTAINABILITY ? EXPERINCES FROM SUSPRONET,” Bus. Strateg. Environmet, vol. 260, pp. 246–260, 2004.

K. Waldhör, “Towards an Ownerless Consumption in Western Europe- ­ ‐ The Main Drivers for the Usage of ( S ) PSS on the Basis of Car Sharing Master ’ s Thesis,” 2014.

K. Lee, V. Nubbe, B. Rego, M. Hansen, and M. Pattison, “2020 LED Manufacturing Supply Chain,” 2021.

S. Chowdhury, D. Haftor, and N. Pashkevich, “Smart Product-Service Systems ( Smart PSS ) in Industrial Firms : A Literature Review,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 73, no. May 2018, pp. 26–31, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.333.

S. R. Moro, A. C. Imhof, D. C. Fettermann, and P. A. Cauchick-miguel, “Barriers to bicycle sharing systems implementation : analysis of two unsuccessful PSS,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 73, pp. 191–196, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.312.

J. Ost, A. Paula, J. Luis, D. Ribeiro, and G. Pezzotta, “Product-Service System ( PSS ) design : using Design Thinking and Business Analytics to improve PSS design,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 47, pp. 341–346, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.062.

G. Pourabdollahian and G. Copani, “Development of a PSS-oriented business model for customized production in healthcare,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 30, pp. 492–497, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.158.

A. Rondini, J. Matschewsky, G. Pezzotta, and M. Bertoni, “A simplified approach towards customer and provider value in PSS for small and medium-sized enterprises,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 73, no. May 2018, pp. 61–66, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.330.

A. Q. Li and P. Found, “Lean and Green Supply Chain for the Product-Services System (PSS): The Literature Review and A Conceptual Framework,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 47, pp. 162–167, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.057.

C. Johansson, J. Elfsberg, T. C. Larsson, M. Frank, L. J. Leifer, and V. Söderberg, “Urban Mining as a Case for PSS,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 47, pp. 460–465, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.089.

M. Orellano, G. Neubert, L. Gzara, and M. Le-dain, “Business Model configuration for PSS : An explorative study,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 64, pp. 97–102, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.008.

A. Paula, J. Seidel, G. Seliger, and H. Kohl, “Sustainability factors for PSS business models,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 47, pp. 436–441, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.021.

M. Orellano, C. Lambey-checchin, K. Medini, and G. Neubert, “Towards an integration of lifecycle thinking into PSS business models,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 73, no. May 2018, pp. 291–296, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.04.017.

M. De Pádua, F. Blomsma, T. C. Mcaloone, and D. C. A. Pigosso, “Enabling circular strategies with different types of product / service-systems,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 73, no. May 2018, pp. 179–184, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.327.

T. Ritchey, “Applications of General Morphological Analysis,” vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–40, 2015.

E. Kohlbeck, P. A. Cauchick-miguel, G. Henrique, and D. S. Mendes, “A Longitudinal History-Based Review of the Product-Service System : Past , Present , and Future,” SUSTAINABILITY, pp. 1–23, 2023.

D. Demyanova, M. Colucci, E. Sirimal, and A. Vecchi, “Assessing consumers ’ propensity towards product-service systems in the fashion industry : A cross-national comparison between Russia and Italy,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 428, no. February, 2023.

C. Muylaert, V. S. C. Tunn, and K. Mar, “On the attractiveness of clothing libraries for women : Investigating the adoption of product-service systems from a practice-based perspective,” Sustain. Prod. Consum., vol. 45, no. October 2023, pp. 359–370, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2024.01.012.

M. Salwin and A. Kraslawski, “Product-Service System business model for plastics industry,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 451, no. February, p. 141874, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141874.

J. Van Gaubergen, E. Paredis, and T. Block, “‘ Fit-to-transform ’ : An institutional perspective on the empowerment of clothing product-service systems,” Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions, vol. 49, no. February, p. 100781, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2023.100781.

A. Osterwalder and Y. Pigneur, “CLARIFYING BUSINESS MODELS : ORIGINS , PRESENT , AND FUTURE OF THE CONCEPT CLARIFYING BUSINESS MODELS : ORIGINS , PRESENT , AND FUTURE OF THE CONCEPT,” Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 15, no. May, 2005.

J. Sibalija, D. Barrett, M. Subasri, L. Bitacola, and R. B. Kim, “Understanding value in a healthcare setting : An application of the business model canvas,” Methodol. Innov., 2021, doi: 10.1177/20597991211050477.

S. Sparviero and S. Sparviero, “The Case for a Socially Oriented Business Model Canvas : The Social Enterprise Model Canvas The Case for a Socially Oriented Business Model Canvas : The Social Enterprise Model Canvas,” J. Soc. Entrep., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 232–251, 2019, doi: 10.1080/19420676.2018.1541011.

T. Otsuka, R. Ishizaki, T. Ahamed, and R. Noguchi, “Three-layer business model canvas of oil-water separation equipment in restaurants and food processing factories,” Energy Nexus, vol. 13, no. December 2023, p. 100273, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.nexus.2024.100273.

J. Pollard et al., “Implementing a circular economy business model canvas in the electrical and electronic manufacturing sector : A case study approach,” Sustain. Prod., vol. 36, pp. 17–31, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.12.009.

K. Krauss, C. Moll, and K. Jonathan, “Research in Transportation Business & Management Designing mobility-as-a-service business models using morphological analysis,” Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., vol. 45, no. June, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100857.

S. Seidenstricker, S. Scheuerle, and C. Linder, “Business Model Prototyping – Using the Morphological Analysis to Develop New Business Models,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 148, pp. 102–109, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.023.

Z. Raoofi, E. Stenemo, A. Engholm, and A. Pernestål, “How can we structure the future development of automation , How can we structure the future development of automation , electrification , and digitalization in the transportation sector by electrification , and digitalization in the transportation sector ,” Transp. Res. Procedia, vol. 72, pp. 1808–1815, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.657.

R. Wong, “Business Design Canvas — v2.2.”

J. Hwan and S. Yoo, “A MORPHOLOGICAL APPROACH TO BUSINESS MODEL CREATION USING CASE-BASED REASONING,” in International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED11, 2011.

G. George and A. J. Bock, “The Business Model in Practice and its Implications for Entrepreneurship Research,” Entrep. Theory Pract., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 83–111, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00424.x.

J. Landeta, J. Barrutia, and A. Lertxundi, “Technological Forecasting & Social Change Hybrid Delphi : A methodology to facilitate contribution from experts in professional contexts,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., vol. 78, no. 9, pp. 1629–1641, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.009.

B. T. Hunsaker and D. E. Thomas, “The Viability Triad : Desirability , Feasibility , and Sustainability as the New Strategic Decision Imperative,” vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–3, 2017, doi: 10.15640/jeds.v4n2a1.

B. Viability and C. Flow, “Business Viability,” Bus. Organ., pp. 1–11.

A. Murray and V. Scuotto, “The Business Model Canvas,” pp. 94–109, 2015.

S. R. Moro, P. A. Cauchick-miguel, G. Henrique, and D. S. Mendes, “Literature analysis on product-service systems business model : a promising research field,” vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2022.

K. C. Felix Ng, “The Application of Product Service Systems for Hydraulic Excavators,” 2016.

E. Johnson, “Product-Service Systems and Sustainability : Analysing the Environmental Impacts of Rental Clothing,” sustainability, 2021.

F. Adrodegari, A. Alghisi, M. Ardolino, N. Saccani, and X. Boucher, “From ownership to service-oriented business models : a survey in capital goods companies and a PSS typology,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 30, pp. 245–250, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.105.

H. Huang, D. Bucher, J. Kissling, R. Weibel, and M. Raubal, “Multimodal Route Planning with Public Transport and Carpooling,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., no. November, 2018, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2018.2876570.

H. Husniah, G. G. Rachman, and S. A. Rachman, “Opportunistic Maintenance under Product – Service System for Usage Based Transportation System,” in Proceedings of the 2nd African International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Harare, Zimbabwe, December 7-10, 2020, 2020, pp. 2843–2852.

M. Sholihah, T. Maezono, Y. Mitake, and Y. Shimomura, “PSS Strategic Alignment : Linking Service Transition Strategy with PSS Business Model,” pp. 13–15, 2019.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-01

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 2 (2024): June 2024

Section

Articles

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Copyright Notice

An author who publishes in the SITEKIN Journal agrees to the following terms:

  • Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
  • Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Author is  permitted and encouraged to post his/her  work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.