Embracing Risk Factors into Product Redesign Model based on DFMA and Concurrent Engineering: A Review for Research Opportunities

Authors

  • Tri Andi Setiawan Design and Manufacture Engineering Study Program, Marine Mechanical Engineering Department, Shipbuilding Institute of Polytechnic Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Anda Iviana Juniani Design and Manufacture Engineering Study Program, Marine Mechanical Engineering Department, Shipbuilding Institute of Polytechnic Surabaya, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1441-7715
  • Sryang Tera Sarena Electrical and Electronic Engineering Department, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Dhika A Purnomo Marine Mechanical Engineering Department, Shipbuilding Institute of Polytechnic Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Pranidiya O Ningrum Design and Manufacture Engineering Study Program, Marine Mechanical Engineering Department, Shipbuilding Institute of Polytechnic Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24014/sitekin.v22i1.32908

Abstract

Product redesign strategies can reduce production costs and shorten design lead times in developing new variants. In the manufacturing design model, identifying the function of components based on customer demand and quality standards becomes vital information for enhancing product reliability, even though design reliability analysis needs to be more frequently addressed. The Design for Manufacturing & Assembly (DFMA) model has been implemented to simplify product structure, reduce risk and manufacturing and assembly costs, and analyze and identify improvement targets. DFMA has evolved into a philosophy for optimizing total production costs from the perspective of assembly, part design, and total life cycle costs. In many studies, the design and development of remanufactured products have been conducted with quality and compliant initiatives. The form and behavior of failure and repair activities obtained during the conceptual design phase have yet to be systematically considered as the basis for product design enhancements. Risk considerations and failure analysis have yet to be utilized as an integrated model during the product redesign phase. This study aims to evaluate the existing DFMA model and develop a new product redesign model and repurposed product with the integration of the Concurrent Engineering (CE)-based Redesign for the Manufacturing & Assembly model by considering reliability and risk factors. Incorporating the model concept is anticipated to contribute to a dependable, efficient design and reduce manufacturing expenses

References

S. Sivaloganathan and P. Hills, “Design for excellence,” J. Eng. Des., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–2, 2002.

M. C. Chiu and G. E. O. Kremer, “Investigation of the applicability of Design for X tools during design concept evolution: a literature review,” Int. J. Prod. Dev., vol. 13, no. 2, p. 132, 2011.

T. C. Kuo, S. H. Huang, and H. C. Zhang, “Design for manufacture and design for ‘X’: Concepts, applications, and perspectives,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 241–260, 2001.

M. Chiu, C. Lin, and G. Okudan, “An Investigation of the Applicability of DfX Tools during Design Concept Evolution Design for X Design for Efficiency Eco-system,” Network, no. 1, pp. 1–10.

M. Silverman and A. Kleyner, “What is design for reliability and what is not?,” Proc. - Annu. Reliab. Maintainab. Symp., no. November, 2012.

C. Johansson, On system safety and reliability methods in early design phases. 2013.

D. N. P. Murthy, M. Rausand, and S. Virtanen, “Investment in new product reliability,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 94, no. 10, pp. 1593–1600, 2009.

G. Boothroyd, Product design for manufacture and assembly, vol. 26, no. 7. 1994.

B. Prasad and W. Bloomfield, “A Concurrent Function Deployment Process for Product Life-cycle Management Introduction Limitations in Deploying QFD in a Concurent Design Process,” no. Vcm.

I. Gerdemeli, C. Fetvaci, and E. Kayaoglu, “Design for assembly in concurrent engineering a case study on its application: Glass block holder and glass mold,” Key Eng. Mater., vol. 450, pp. 141–144, 2011.

B. D. Methods, “Detc2017-68126 Evaluating Assembly Design Efficiency : a Comparison Between,” pp. 1–20, 2017.

Y. He, C. Gu, Z. He, and J. Cui, “Reliability-oriented quality control approach for production process based on RQR chain,” Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell., vol. 29, no. 5–6, pp. 652–672, 2018.

R. Bogue, “Design for manufacture and assembly: Background, capabilities and applications,” Assem. Autom., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 112–118, 2012.

S. V. S. Dochibhatla, M. Bhattacharya, and B. Morkos, “Evaluating assembly design efficiency: A comparison between lucas and boothroyd-dewhurst methods,” in Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 2017, vol. 4.

B. V. Chowdary, M. A. Richards, and T. Gokool, “An integrated approach for sustainable product design: concurrent application of DFMA, DFE and CAD/CAE principles and tools,” Lat. Am. J. Manag. Sustain. Dev., vol. 4, no. 4, p. 259, 2019.

B. V. Chowdary, R. L. Bhagan, and K. Ojha, “Improvement of operational efficiency in a jobshop using lean manufacturing principles: a case study,” Int. J. Collab. Enterp., vol. 5, no. 3/4, p. 125, 2016.

J. Smith and P. J. Clarkson, “Design concept modelling to improve reliability,” J. Eng. Des., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 473–492, 2005.

J. M. Cui, Y. H. He, C. L. Zhu, and F. D. Liu, “Reliability-oriented quality risk modeling and monitoring approach in manufacturing process,” IEEE Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Eng. Manag., vol. 2017-Decem, pp. 2093–2097, 2018.

T. Osteras, M. Rausand, and D. N. P. Murthy, “Reliability specification in new product development,” Int. J. Prod. Dev., vol. 5, no. 1/2, p. 17, 2007.

G. Li, M. Reimann, and W. Zhang, “When remanufacturing meets product quality improvement: The impact of production cost,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 271, no. 3, pp. 913–925, 2018.

K. G. Lough, R. Stone, and I. Y. Tumer, “The risk in early design method,” J. Eng. Des., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 155–173, 2009.

H. C. Liu, X. Q. Chen, C. Y. Duan, and Y. M. Wang, “Failure mode and effect analysis using multi-criteria decision making methods: A systematic literature review,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 135, no. June, pp. 881–897, 2019.

C. Imrak and M. Kocaman, “Design Optimization on Evelator Car for Double-Deck System,” pp. 37–40, 2012.

M. Kalyun and T. Wodajo, “Application of a Design Method for Manufacture and Assembly -Flexible Assembly Methods and their Evaluaiton for the Construction of Bridges,” pp. 17–19, 2012.

M. Mobin and Z. Li, “An Integrated Approach to Plan the Design Verification and Validation Activities for the New Product Reliability Improvement,” Proc. - Annu. Reliab. Maintainab. Symp., vol. 2018-Janua, pp. 1–7, 2018.

H. C. Fang, S. K. Ong, and A. Y. C. Nee, “An Integrated Approach for Product Remanufacturing Assessment and Planning,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 40, pp. 262–267, 2016.

Y. H. He, L. B. Wang, Z. Z. He, and M. Xie, “A fuzzy TOPSIS and Rough Set based approach for mechanism analysis of product infant failure,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 47, pp. 25–37, 2016.

K. D. Sharma and S. Srivastava, “Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) Implementation: A Literature Review,” Copyr. J. Adv. Res. Aeronaut. Sp. Sci. J Adv Res Aero SpaceSci, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2454–8669, 2018.

L. Wang, C. Xiong, and Y. Yang, “A novel methodology of reliability-based multidisciplinary design optimization under hybrid interval and fuzzy uncertainties,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 337, pp. 439–457, 2018.

P. N. Bajeel and M. Kumar, “Reliability test plan for a series system with variable failure rates,” Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag., vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 849–861, 2017.

F. Shaker, A. Shahin, and S. Jahanyan, “Developing a two-phase QFD for improving FMEA: an integrative approach,” Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag., no. D, 2019.

H. Yu, G. Zhang, Y. Ran, M. Li, and Y. Wang, “A comprehensive and practical reliability allocation method considering failure effects and reliability costs,” Eksploat. i Niezawodn. - Maint. Reliab., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 244–251, 2018.

M. Wouters, S. Morales, S. Grollmuss, and M. Scheer, “Methods for cost management during product development: A review and comparison of different literatures,” Adv. Manag. Account., vol. 26, pp. 139–274, 2016.

Juniani, A.I.; Singgih, M.L.; Karningsih, P.D. Design for Manufacturing, Assembly, and Reliability: An Integrated Framework for Product Redesign and Innovation. Designs 2022, 6, 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs6050088

Downloads

Published

2024-12-26

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 1 (2024): December 2024

Section

Articles

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

Copyright Notice

An author who publishes in the SITEKIN Journal agrees to the following terms:

  • Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
  • Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Author is  permitted and encouraged to post his/her  work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.